Patna High Court
CR. MISC./48637/2026 of Aman Thathera @ Aman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48637 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2026 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Aman Thathera @ Aman Kumar S/o Arun Kumar Thathera Resident of - Ramgarh, Ward No. 9, P.S
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48637 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2026 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
Aman Thathera @ Aman Kumar S/o Arun Kumar Thathera Resident of - Ramgarh, Ward No. 9, P.S - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur at Bhabhua
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
16-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of four cases out of which one case is under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 103.68 litres of liquor from a car.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and the vehicle is registered in the name of Raj Kumar Singh. It is further submitted that petitioner intended Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48637 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
to purchase the car, but then the transaction could not go through but still police based on statement of Raj Kumar implicated the petitioner in the instant case.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No.103 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48637 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026
this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedent of four cases only, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T