Patna High Court
CR. MISC./32792/2026 of Manjit Bind @ Manjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32792 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2025 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Manjit Bind @ Manjit Kumar Son of Jagan Bind Resident of Village- Mahadeochak Semaria, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32792 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2025 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ======================================================
Manjit Bind @ Manjit Kumar Son of Jagan Bind Resident of Village- Mahadeochak Semaria, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Ramanuj Tiwary
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
16-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Koilwar P. S. Case No.296 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges based on secret information that house of Saraswati Devi was raided and from her house, a country-made rifle and a country-made double barrel gun was recovered and she disclosed that the arms belongs to petitioner who had given her to keep it secretly.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case based on confessional statement of Sarawasti Devi in police custody which Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32792 of 2026(3) dt.16-07-2026
does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that petitioner has no concern or relation with Saraswati Devi or husband Sanjay Bind.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that from perusal of the pleadings made in the anticipatory bail application, it manifests that petitioner knows Saraswati Devi and her husband Sanjay Bind, but then has not pleaded that he had any enmity with them nor has disclosed what the petitioner does for earning her living-hood. It is next submitted that off late in the State of Bihar, illegal weapons are being rampantly used in occurrences. It is further submitted that investigation in the case is continuing and interrogation of the petitioner is required.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T