Patna High Court
CWJC/1868/2020 of Umar Faruq Vs The Union of India on 16 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1868 of 2020 ====================================================== Umar Faruq Son of late Abdul Hafiz Resident of Hussain Baks Lane Near Picture Palace, Shah Market, Khalifabagh, Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur, P.S. Kotwali, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1868 of 2020
======================================================
Umar Faruq Son of late Abdul Hafiz Resident of Hussain Baks Lane Near Picture Palace, Shah Market, Khalifabagh, Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur, P.S.
Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar-812001
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union of India through the General Manager, Eastern Railway, 3- Koelaghat Street, Kolkata- 700001 Railway.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Krishna Mohan Murari, Advocate
For the Union of India
:
Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar (Add. Sc. Railway)
Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, (Sr. Panel Counsel)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
16-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “that through this writ petition, the petitioner seeks and prays for issuance a direction to the sole respondent to pay a sum of rs. 8 Lacs on account of injuries sustained by his minor and unmarried son Md. Hussain in the railway accident on 12.08.2017 while he was passing through the railway track at west cabin, Bhagalpur railway station.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.1868 of 2020(4) dt.16-07-2026
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be taking recourse to alternate remedy available under the law of the land.
4. Granting liberty and without committing on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of.
ankita/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U