Patna High Court

CR. MISC./23583/2026 of Abhishek Patel @ Abhishek Suraj Patel @ Rahul Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23583 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-992 Year-2023 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Abhishek Patel @ Abhishek Suraj Patel @ Rahul Singh S/O Rajesh Patel @ Bhajan Singh @

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23583 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-992 Year-2023 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

======================================================

Abhishek Patel @ Abhishek Suraj Patel @ Rahul Singh S/O Rajesh Patel @

Bhajan Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh R/O Village- Kalani, P.S.- Chakia, Distt.- Chaundali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Tejaswani Kumari D/O- Krish pratap Singh r/o vill- Batonor(Bhabua) PS- Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate

For the State

:

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP

For the Informant

:

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

3 15-07-2026 Heard Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the informant as also learned APP representing the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 992 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 and 507 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 01.11.2023 by the informant Tejaswini Kumari.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Accordingly, the anticipatory application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead