Patna High Court
CR. MISC./46489/2026 of Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 15 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46489 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2025 Thana- Raghunathpur Excise District- Siwan ====================================================== Pappu Yadav S/o Late Binod Yadav Resident of Village- Barwa Uttarwari Tola, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46489 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2025 Thana- Raghunathpur Excise District- Siwan ======================================================
Pappu Yadav S/o Late Binod Yadav Resident of Village- Barwa Uttarwari Tola, P.S.- Andar, Distt.- Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
15-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 9 cases, out of which, 5 cases are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 996.480 litres of liquor from bank of Ghaghra river near bathan of Suman Yadav.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46489 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026
and is accessible to villagers at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either through chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information without holding a proper investigation.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.45,000/- (Rupees forty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Raghunathpur Excise P.S. Case No.178 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46489 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026
shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than 9 cases, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of 9 cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T