Patna High Court
CR. MISC./46505/2026 of Puja Kumari Vs The State of Bihar on 15 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46505 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Puja Kumari W/o Guddu Kumar, D/o Baleshwar Das Resident of - Manjhala, P.O.- Nagwan, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46505 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ======================================================
Puja Kumari W/o Guddu Kumar, D/o Baleshwar Das Resident of - Manjhala, P.O.- Nagwan, P.S.- Meskaur, Mirzapur, District- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Amit Ranjan
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Sucheta Yadav
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
15-07-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and allegation is of recovery of 80 litres of liquor from the house of Ranjeet and 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and she has no concern or relation with Ranjit and she came to be implicated based on the fact that she is owner of the seized vehicle. It is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46505 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026
next submitted that no prudent person would use her own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against herself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that her friend would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged. It is also submitted that it is not the case of the prosecution that they saw a woman fleeing from the place of occurrence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 427 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed her antecedent before this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46505 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T