Patna High Court
CWJC/10049/2026 of Indrapari Devi @ Indra Pari Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 14 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10049 of 2026 ====================================================== Indrapari Devi @ Indra Pari Devi Wife of Late Jagdish Jha, Resident of Village- Hati, Uchhati, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10049 of 2026
======================================================
Indrapari Devi @ Indra Pari Devi Wife of Late Jagdish Jha, Resident of Village- Hati, Uchhati, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga.
4.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Darbhanga.
5.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Biraul, District- Darbhanga.
6.
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Biraul, Darbhanga.
7.
The Circle Officer, Biraul, District Darbhanga.
8.
Sudha Devi, Wife of Shashikant Jha, Resident of Village- Hati, Uchhati, P.S- Biraul, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Standing Counsel (25)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
14-07-2026 Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, learned AC to SC-25.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i For issuance of an appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s to the respondent no.-7 for measurement of land and demarcation of boundary under Block- Biraul, Mauza- Hati, Thana No.-297, Khata No.- 38(New), Khesra No.- 550, 551(New), Patna High Court CWJC No.10049 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026
590, 591(old) admeasuring 2 Katha 4 Dhur which is khatiyani land and was possession of the petitioner upon which she has been living peacefully for a long period.
ii. For issuance of an appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s to the respondents to restrain the private respondents who are interfering in peaceful possession of the land of the petitioner on the ground that the said land was obtained from her, in fact the petitioner is legal heir of the said land and she has sold and executed a sale deed in favour of the private respondent situated under Block-Biraul, Mauza- Hati, Thana No.-257, Khata No.-38(New), Khesra No.- 550, 551(New), 590, 591(old) only one and half Katha approx. 7.63 dismil.
iii. For issuance of an appropriate writ/s, order/s, direction/s to the respondent no.-7 that after measurement of the land of the petitioner in presence of respondent no.-8, hand over the possession of the said land after demarcation so that quietus may be given to the disputes arose Patna High Court CWJC No.10049 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026
between the petitioner and respondent no.-8.
iv. To pass such other order/s as your lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if his representation before the respondent no. 5, the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Biraul, Darbhanga be disposed of.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it.
5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned Officer within a period of four weeks who shall be duty bound to look into the matter and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months thereafter.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U