Patna High Court
CWJC/3090/2024 of Md. Safiruddin Vs The State of Bihar on 14 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3090 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Safiruddin Son of Jalu Mohammad Resident Nadiyagachh Gangnati Taiyapur Police Station- Pothia District-Kisanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3090 of 2024
======================================================
Md. Safiruddin Son of Jalu Mohammad Resident Nadiyagachh Gangnati Taiyapur Police Station- Pothia District-Kisanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar.
3.
The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Government of Bihar.
4.
The District Magistrate, Kishanganj, Bihar.
5.
The Senior Deputy Collector, Banking, Kishanganj.
6.
The District Education Officer, Kishanganj, Bihar.
7.
The Block Education Officer, Pothniya, Kishanganj, Bihar.
8.
Md. Nasim S/o Basiruddin R/o Village Gognati, P.O.-Chanamana, P.S.- Pothiya, District-Kishanganj.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the State
:
Mr. Raghwendra Kumar, SC 22
Mr. Rajesh Roy, AC to SC 22
For the Madarsa Board
:
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv.
Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Adv.
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-07-2026 Learned Advocates for the respective parties are present.
2. Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that substantial grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. However, with respect to monetary benefit, the petitioner seeks permission to approach before the respondent No. 6, who is the competent authority in this regard.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3090 of 2024 dt.14-07-2026 2/2
3. Learned Advocates for the respondents have no objection.
4. In view thereof, the present writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the respondent No. 6, in accordance with law.
Anjani/- (Harish Kumar, J) AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.07.2026 Transmission Date