Patna High Court
CWJC/4723/2025 of Bishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 14 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4723 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Bishal Kumar Son of Mithilesh Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea. 2. Nilesh Kumar, Son of Mithilesh Ray resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4723 of 2025
======================================================
1.
Bishal Kumar Son of Mithilesh Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O.
and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
2.
Nilesh Kumar, Son of Mithilesh Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O.
and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
3.
Indo Ray, Son of Late Lakhan Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
4.
Mukesh Kumar Ray @ Mukesh Ray, Son of Late Kapildeo Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
5.
Vesheshwar Ray, Son of Late Lakhan Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
6.
Amar Ray, Son of Late Kedar Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
7.
Smt. Savitri Devi, Wife of Alkeshari Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
8.
Shyamsundar Devi, Wife of Parmeshwari Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
9.
Gita Devi, Wife of Mahadeo Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
10.
Vateshwar Ray, Son of Late Lakhan Ray resident of Village- Sanjhaghat, P.O. and P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar.
2.
The District Magistrate, Purnea.
3.
The Superintendent of Police, Purnea.
4.
The Officer-in-Charge, Mirganj P.S., District- Purnea.
5.
Rashik Hembram, Son of Late Chere Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya
6.
Ram Lal Hembram, Son of Late Chere Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
7.
Pradhan Hembram, Son of Late Chere Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
8.
Babu Lal Hembram, Late Chere Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
9.
Ajay Kumar Hembram, Son of Ram Lal Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
10.
Sanjay Kumar Hembram, Son of Ram Lal Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4723 of 2025(3) dt.14-07-2026
11.
Deo Narayan Hembram, Son of Pradhan Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
12.
Sanjit Hembram, Son of Pradhan Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya
Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
13.
Upendra Hembram, Son of Pradhan Hembram resident of Village- Cheriya
Tola Santhal Tola, P.S.- Mirganj, P.O.- Sanjhaghat, District- Purnea.
14.
Devendra Narayan Chaudhari, son of Late Daroga Prasad Chaudhari, resident of Village- Damaili, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Prem Kumar, Advocate
:
Mr. Uma Shankar, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Addl. Advocate General (12)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
14-07-2026 Heard Mr. Prem Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and and learned counsel representing the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for passing necessary order/orders or direction/directions as nature of the case may require commanding the respondent authorities to provide shelter and security to the petitioners and his property as detailed hereunder by way of issuing writ of mandamus inasmuch as seeking direction to the concern authorities not to allow the private respondents to enter/disturb into exclusive and peaceful possession of the said properties of the petitioners by way of issuing Patna High Court CWJC No.4723 of 2025(3) dt.14-07-2026
writ of prohibition and/or in alternative seeking for a direction to respondent No. 2 to dispose of the application/representation, filed by the petitioners by way of passing a reasoned order.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he shall be approaching the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Purnea for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection.
5. The writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Purnea who shall be looking into the matter and passing an appropriate order in accordance with law after hearing all the necessary parties.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U