Patna High Court
CWJC/9759/2026 of Sanjay Kumar Bharti Vs The Union of India on 13 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9759 of 2026 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Bharti Son of Late Hari Lal Baitha, Resident of - Ward No.-11, Basantpur, Durga Mandir, Pustkalaya Road, P.S.- Birpur, P.O.- Basantpur, District- Supaul,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9759 of 2026
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar Bharti Son of Late Hari Lal Baitha, Resident of - Ward No.-11, Basantpur, Durga Mandir, Pustkalaya Road, P.S.- Birpur, P.O.- Basantpur, District- Supaul, Bihar- 854340.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary Department of Home Affairs, New Delhi.
2.
The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of India, New Delhi.
3.
Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), through its Inspector General, Vijaynagar, Patna- 800014.
4.
The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa.
7.
The District Collector, Supaul.
8.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Supaul.
9.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Birpur, District- Supaul.
10.
The Circle Officer, Basantpur, District- Supaul.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Additional Solicitor General
For the UOI
:
Mrs. Shally Kumari, CGC
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
13-07-2026 Heard Mr. Amrit Abhijat, learned counsel for the petitioner, the State as also the Union of India.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “A. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay balance of compensation Patna High Court CWJC No.9759 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026
amount with respect to 4 Khata of land apertainig to Khata No.- 235( New), Khesra No.- 1542/1650 (New) and 1542/1651 (New) Mauza- Dhaphar, Circle-Basantpur, District- Supaul with respect to 4 Khata of land at the rate of commercial nature of land, as he has L.P.G. godown on the piece of land however he has been erroneously paid compensation of developing residential nature of the land. B. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay compensation to petitioner of building/structure standing on Khata No. 235(New), Khesra No.- 1542/1650 and 1542/1651 Mauza-Dhaphar, Circle- Basantpur, District- Supaul, as the same has not been paid till date. C. Any other relief/s, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances may also be granted.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if his matter is taken up for consideration by respondent no. 8, the District Land Acquisition Patna High Court CWJC No.9759 of 2026(2) dt.13-07-2026
Officer, Supaul.
4. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel representing the Union of India have no objection to it.
5. In that background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 8, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Supaul within a period of four weeks who shall be duty bound to look into the matter and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months thereafter.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U