Patna High Court
CR. MISC./47705/2026 of Vikash Sah @ Vikash Saw Vs The State of Bihar on 10 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47705 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29495 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vikash Sah @ Vikash Saw S/O Mahadev Sah @ Mahdev
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47705 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29495 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ======================================================
Vikash Sah @ Vikash Saw S/O Mahadev Sah @ Mahdev Sah @ Mahadev Sah R/O Village- Manmohan, P.S - Basopatti, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Karn
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
10-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present modification application has been filed for modifying the order dated 04.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29495 of 2026 by which the petitioner was granted bail with the following conditions :-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47705 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to communication gap on the basis of the information furnished by the Pairvikar, it was stated in para-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner carries only one criminal antecedent but in fact, the petitioner carries two criminal antecedents.
4. The Court also noticed Section 362 of Cr.P.C./ Section 403 of BNSS which reads as follows :- “362/403 – Court not to alter judgment. Save as otherwise provided by this Code/Sanhita or by any other law for the time being in force, no Court, when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47705 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error.”
5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant modification petition is dismissed.
Gaurav Sinha/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T