Patna High Court
CR. MISC./44444/2026 of Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 10 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44444 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7380 of 2026 Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-274, Year-2025, Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL, District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sumit Kumar, Son of Late Nawal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 44444 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7380 of 2026
Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-274, Year-2025, Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL, District- Begusarai ======================================================
Sumit Kumar, Son of Late Nawal Kishore Singh @ Nawal Singh, R/o- Sihma, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Meena Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
10-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This modification application has been filed for modification of condition ‘(v)’ mentioned in paragraph no. 6 of the order dated 20.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7380 of 2026 by this Court, whereby the petitioner was granted bail.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the conditions as contained in paragraph 6 (v), the bail bonds of the petitioner were not accepted, as inadvertently in paragraph 3 of the main bail application, one criminal antecedent which the petitioner carried was inadvertently not stated.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of such a condition, despite bail being granted to him, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 44444 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
he could not have been released.
5. The aforesaid bail application bearing Cr. Misc. No. 7380 of 2026 was allowed with the particular condition stated therein: “6 (v) The learned court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification”.
6. In view of such a condition, it was mandatory upon the petitioner to come out clean in stating the antecedent and as such the present application stands dismissed.
7. The petitioner is directed to move this Court afresh with a prayer for bail.
sweta/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U T