Patna High Court
CR. MISC./53512/2015 of Hazi Hannan @ Mazhar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr on 9 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53512 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3358 Year-2012 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Hazi Hannan @ Mazhar Son of Late Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Village- Madhepur Tola
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53512 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3358 Year-2012 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE
District- Katihar
======================================================
Hazi Hannan @ Mazhar Son of Late Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Village- Madhepur Tola Bagdob, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Md. Subhan Son of Haji Yakub Resident of Village- Ajhrail, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
09-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 25.06.2015 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II, Katihar in Criminal Revision No.133 of 2013 by which revision application against the order dated 12.07.2013 passed in Complaint Case No.3358 of 2012 was rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had already been died during the pendency of present application, accordingly, he prays that this case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53512 of 2015(7) dt.09-07-2026
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become infructuous.
Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T