Patna High Court
CR. MISC./23715/2026 of Abhay Kumar @ Bholu Vishwakarma @ Bhola Vs The State of Bihar on 9 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23715 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Abhay Kumar @ Bholu Vishwakarma @ Bhola Son of Om Vishwakarma @ Umashankar Vishwakarma @
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23715 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ======================================================
Abhay Kumar @ Bholu Vishwakarma @ Bhola Son of Om Vishwakarma @
Umashankar Vishwakarma @ Umashankar Mistri Resident of Mohalla- Ramana, Sherghatti, P.S.- Sherghatti, District- Gayaji
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
09-07-2026 Heard Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 20.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. According to prosecution case, while the informant was walking in the garden, three accused persons on motorcycle overtook him and co-accused Danish Ekbal fired upon him due to which he received injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23715 of 2026(3) dt.09-07-2026
petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the petitioner was not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, namely, Vikky Kumar, Aashish Kumar, Piyush Kumar and Satish Kumar @ Chandan @ Chadiya and they have stated that the petitioner was involved in the present crime in question and he alongwith other co-accused persons have fired upon the victim and injury inflicted upon the injured person is grievous in nature caused by firearm injury.
5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State, on other other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Sherghati, Gayaji.
7. Prayer is refused.
Nitesh/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T