Patna High Court
CWJC/13850/2022 of Chandrama Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 9 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13850 of 2022 ====================================================== 1. Chandrama Devi wife of Indal Sahani, resident of Village and P.O.- Hussaini, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District- East Champaran, Motihari. 2. Keshariya Prakhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13850 of 2022
======================================================
1.
Chandrama Devi wife of Indal Sahani, resident of Village and P.O.- Hussaini, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District- East Champaran, Motihari.
2.
Keshariya Prakhand Matsyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. through its Secretary Chandrama Devi (Female) aged about 50 years, wife of Indal Sahani, resident of Village and P.O.- Hussaini, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District- East Champaran, Motihari.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Secretary Animal Husbandry and Fish Resource Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Deputy Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fish Resource Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director Fisheries Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The District Fisheries Officer-cum- Chief Executive Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.
5.
The Bihar State Election Authority, Patna through its Chief Election Officer, 32, Harding Road, Patna- 1.
6.
The Bihar State Election Authority, Patna through its Secretary, 32, Harding Road, Patna- 1.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ram Nibash Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam ( AAG 12 )
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
2 09-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that this application has become infructuous.
3. The application stands dismissed as having been become infructuous.
krishna/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U