Patna High Court
CR. MISC./43499/2026 of Shakil Ahmad @ Shakil Ahamad @ Shakil Vs The State of Bihar on 8 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43499 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Shakil Ahmad @ Shakil Ahamad @ Shakil son of Late Tamijuddin Resident of village-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43499 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj ======================================================
Shakil Ahmad @ Shakil Ahamad @ Shakil son of Late Tamijuddin Resident of village- Kauwabhitta, Po- Nainagachhi, Ps- Kurlikot, Dist- Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with one Md. Razzaque, was riding on a scooty from which a total of 208 grams of brown sugar was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43499 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.05.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge (NDPS Act), Kishanganj in connection with Galgalia P.S. Case No. 47 of 2026.
Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T