Patna High Court

CR. MISC./43144/2026 of Sujit Kumar @ Kamla Vs The State of Bihar on 6 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43144 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2022 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sujit Kumar @ Kamla Son of Ganesh Paswan R/O village- Khatua, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43144 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2022 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================

Sujit Kumar @ Kamla Son of Ganesh Paswan R/O village- Khatua, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

06-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that some unknown miscreants have snatched Rs. 29587/- on gun point from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Guddu has given his confessional statement and he has named this petitioner in his confessional statement. Nothing has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43144 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026

recovered from the possession of this petitioner. No TIP has been conducted. Learned counsel has submitted that co-accused Vishal has also given his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statements of co-accused persons, there is nothing against this petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 78641 of 2023 and 23923 of 2024. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran.

Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead