Patna High Court
CWJC/12766/2023 of Dinesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar on 6 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12766 of 2023 ====================================================== Dinesh Paswan Son of Late Basudeo Paswan Resident of Village-Topkhana Bazar Katghar, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12766 of 2023
======================================================
Dinesh Paswan Son of Late Basudeo Paswan Resident of Village-Topkhana Bazar Katghar, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Divisional Commissioner, Munger.
3.
The District Magistrate, Khagaria,
4.
The District Development Commissioner, Khagaria
5.
The Additional District Magistrate, Khagaria
6.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Khagaria
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
None
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
06-07-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Advocate for the State is present.
3. Learned Advocate for the State submitted that while the petitioner was in service, he was subjected to a departmental proceeding which culminated into his dismissal and the said order was challenged in CWJC 14986 of 2019. The aforesaid writ petition is still pending for consideration. It is further contended that since the petitioner has already been dismissed from services accordingly his pension has been forfeited due to forfeiture of his pensionary rights. However, Patna High Court CWJC No.12766 of 2023(7) dt.06-07-2026
the counter affidavit does not talk about other admissible amount regarding group insurance and GPF.
4. Be that as it may, considering, the fact that the order of dismissal is put to challenge in CWJC 14986 of 2019, the present writ petition stands disposed off.
5. However, in case, the petitioner has not been paid any admissible amount, unaffected by the order of dismissal, the same must be accorded to the petitioner expeditiously.
sumit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U