Patna High Court

CR. MISC./33109/2026 of Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33109 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2023 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ashutosh Kumar, Son of Gulab Yadav, Resident of Village - Kotwali Chauk Near, New Ward No. 42,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33109 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2023 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ======================================================

Ashutosh Kumar, Son of Gulab Yadav, Resident of Village - Kotwali Chauk Near, New Ward No. 42, Gumti, Police Station - Nagar, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Md. Soban Asghar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

03-07-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The Office has pointed out that the defect no.6(6) has not completely been removed.

3. From perusal of the order sheet, it transpires that on 08.05.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner was granted one week's time to remove the defect and thereafter, again on 15.05.2026, he was granted more than one month's time to remove the defects, however, despite passage of more than two months, the defect still stands.

4. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33109 of 2026(5) dt.03-07-2026

pursuing the present application.

5. In view of the above, the present application stands dismissed for non-prosecution, as nobody appears to press the application.

manoj/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead