Patna High Court
MJC/3607/2025 of Manoj Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar through Dr. Sandeep Kumar R Pudakalkatti, the Additional Chief Secretary on 3 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3607 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10597 of 2025 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Ranjan Son of Late Basudev Malakar, Resident of Baisha, Police Station Parwata, District- Khagaria. ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3607 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10597 of 2025
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Ranjan Son of Late Basudev Malakar, Resident of Baisha, Police Station Parwata, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Dr. Sandeep Kumar R Pudakalkatti, the Additional Chief Secretary Road Construction Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
2.
Sri Nirmal Kumar, the Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner- cum-Special Secretary, (Headquarter), Road Construction Department, Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Vikrant Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Jahan Ara, AC to GP-14
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
03-07-2026 Learned Advocates for the respective parties are present.
2. Mr. Vikrant Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submits that the order dated 14.07.2025 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 10597 of 2025 has now been fully complied with. In view thereof, he does not want to press the present application.
3. Learned Advocate for the State reiterates the factum of compliance of the order of this Court.
4. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and the fact that the order Patna High Court MJC No.3607 of 2025(2) dt.03-07-2026
of this Court has been duly complied with, the present contempt petition stands closed.
rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U