Patna High Court
CR. MISC./25001/2026 of Kaila kumar Vs The Sate of Bihar on 2 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25001 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Kaila kumar S/o Ramdhin Mandal R/o Vill. - Lailakh, P.S. - Sabour, District - Bhagalpur. ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25001 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ======================================================
Kaila kumar S/o Ramdhin Mandal R/o Vill. - Lailakh, P.S. - Sabour, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Sate of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants who have masked their faces were armed with country-made weapons and snatched the mobile and Rs. 4,100/- from the informant and his friends. They were able to identify one of the accused, namely, Suman Mandal @ Matra.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the name of this petitioner is not there in the FIR; Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25001 of 2026(4) dt.02-07-2026
rather, his name has surfaced during the course of investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused Nitesh Kumar. Save and except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. No recovery has been made and no TIP was conducted. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 26.01.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent of three cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned court below. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025.
Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T