Patna High Court

CWJC/16435/2025 of Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16435 of 2025 ====================================================== Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd. having its Branch Office at Infront of Jain Colony, Chunihari Tola, Bhagalpur through its Authorized Signatory Ravi Kumar, Male, aged about

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16435 of 2025

======================================================

Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd. having its Branch Office at Infront of Jain Colony, Chunihari Tola, Bhagalpur through its Authorized Signatory Ravi Kumar, Male, aged about 40 years, Son of Sri Kashi Prasad Jalan, Resident of Infront of Jain Colony, Chunihari Tola, P.S. - Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Engineer In-Chief, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer (South), Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Superintending Engineer, Building Circle Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur, Bihar.

5.

The Executive Engineer, Building Division Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur, Bihar.

... ... Respondents

Appearance :

For the Petitioner

:

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate

For the Respondents

:

Mr. S.D. Sanjay, AG

Mr. Mohit Agarwal, AC to AG

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

02-07-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bid validity period for the NIT in question has already expired.

2. Considering the aforesaid submission, this court is of the view that the present writ application has become infructuous.

3. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16435 of 2025(4) dt.02-07-2026

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of.

Atul, Gaurav Kumar/- (Sudhir Singh, J.)

(Ranjan Kumar Jha, J.) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead