Patna High Court

/42942/2026 of Md Asgar @ Asgar Ali @ Mohamad Asgar Vs The State of Bihar on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42942 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2026 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md Asgar @ Asgar Ali @ Mohamad Asgar Son of Late Damri Miya @ Late Mohammad Iqbal Hussain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42942 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2026 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ======================================================

Md Asgar @ Asgar Ali @ Mohamad Asgar Son of Late Damri Miya @ Late Mohammad Iqbal Hussain Resident of Village-Gawandra, P.S-Chakia, District-East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a Madarsha, one automatic country-made pistol was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42942 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026

105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.04.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 141 of 2026.

Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead