Patna High Court

CR. MISC./42185/2026 of Govind Ray @ Govind Kumar Ray @ Govind Ram Vs The State of Bihar on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42185 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Govind Ray @ Govind Kumar Ray @ Govind Ram S/O Mahesh Ray @ Maheshi Ram Resident of Village

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42185 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ======================================================

Govind Ray @ Govind Kumar Ray @ Govind Ram S/O Mahesh Ray @

Maheshi Ram Resident of Village - Mahammadpur Sakara, P.S- Bibhutipur,Dist- Samastipur,Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Rambabu Yadav, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 309(4) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that three persons on a bike intercepted the informant and snatched her mangalsutra and Rs. 3500/- and as she raised alarm, villagers arrived and two miscreants were apprehended and were identified as Sonu Kumar and Vijay Kumar. These two miscreants have stated on being asked that the third person who has managed to flee, is the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42185 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026

petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that save and except confessional statement of apprehended co-accused persons, there is nothing against this petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having two criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rosera.

Shubham/- Sneha/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead