Patna High Court
CR. MISC./42900/2026 of Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kumar Singh @ Ravindra Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 1 July 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 42900 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- Lalamnia District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kumar Singh @ Ravindra Singh S/o Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Mahto
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 42900 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- Lalamnia District- Madhubani ======================================================
Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kumar Singh @ Ravindra Singh S/o Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Mahto Resident of Village- Bhelha, P.S.- Lalmaniya, District- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 22 and 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 27 grams of brown sugar was recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 42900 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. It has also been submitted that the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 29.04.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Lalmaniya P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madhubani.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T