Patna High Court
CR. MISC./42108/2026 of Sujeet Mahto Vs The State of Bihar on 30 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42108 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Sujeet Mahto S/O Rajeshwar Mahto Resident of village- Sapta, Ward no.- 11, P.S.- Rahika, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42108 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ======================================================
Sujeet Mahto S/O Rajeshwar Mahto Resident of village- Sapta, Ward no.- 11, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Anita Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No.07 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have snatched the bike of the informant’s son.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation the name of this petitioner has surfaced in this case on the basis of information given by spy. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that save and except the information given by spy, there is nothing against the petitioner. No recovery has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42108 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
made from the possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that in this case, charge-sheet has been filed but the I.O. has not conducted any TIP. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.01.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date in the learned trial court, whenever required.
7. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M.- 1st Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No.07 of 2026.
durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T