Patna High Court

CR. MISC./41187/2026 of Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 29 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41187 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2026 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Son of Tribhuvan Sah Resident of Village- Ward No. 1 Athari East, P.S.-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41187 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2026 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ======================================================

Santosh Kumar Son of Tribhuvan Sah Resident of Village- Ward No. 1 Athari East, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamrhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.51 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner defalcated altogether Rupees Seven Lakh.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not defalcated any amount. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the order of the learned trial court it will transpire that on 22.04.2026 the mother of this petitioner has deposited the said amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41187 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026

that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 15.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.51 of 2026.

durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead