Patna High Court
CWJC/16581/2022 of Nishant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 29 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16581 of 2022 ====================================================== 1. Nishant Kumar Son of Late Champalal Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali. 2. Satish Kumar Gupta Son of Late Bilat Sah, Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16581 of 2022
======================================================
1.
Nishant Kumar Son of Late Champalal Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
2.
Satish Kumar Gupta Son of Late Bilat Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
3.
Baby Devi Wife of Vijay Gupta, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
4.
Surendra Kumar Son of Ram Avtar Lal, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
5.
Punam Rani Wife of Anjani Kumar, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
6.
Ram Babu Sah Son of Late Bilat Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
7.
Indu Devi Wife of Sohan Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
8.
Ranu Devi Wife of Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
9.
Taiyawa Khanam Wife of Shamim Akhtar Khan, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
10.
Anil Kumar Gupta Son of Raghunath Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
11.
Ramnath Prasad Son of Late Rajkishore Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
12.
Baidnath Pr. Chaudhary, Son of Late Laxmanlal Chaudhary, Resident of
13.
Ramesh Prasad Chaudhary Son of Late Laxmanlal Chaudhary, Resident of
Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
14.
Vijay Kumar Son of Late Vaishali Prasad Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
15.
Mihammad Jahangir Son of Late Lal Mohammand, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
16.
Mohammed Alamgir Son of Late Abdul Shakur, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
17.
Urmila Devi Daughter of Dharmendra Sah, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
18.
Shiv Prasad Singh Son o fLate Dwarika Singh, Resident of Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16581 of 2022(4) dt.29-06-2026
19.
Sant Kumar Chaudhary Son of Late Bhagwan Chaudhary, Resident of
Village- Mahnar, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Secretary, Ministry of Road, Transport and Highway, Government of India, New Delhi.
3.
Director General, Ministry of Road, and Highway, Government of India, New Delhi.
4.
District Collector, Vaishali.
5.
District Land Acquisition Officer, District- Vaishali.
6.
Chief Engineer, National Highways, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
7.
Executive Engineer, National Highways Division, Biharsharif.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Dinu Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Vardaan Mangalam, Adv.
Ms.Ritika Rani, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Mahtab Alam (AC to SC-20)
For the U.O.I.
:
Mr. Alok Kumar, CGC
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Mr. Vardaan Mangalam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, at the outset, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Learned AC to SC-20 as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India does not have any objection to the same.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16581 of 2022(4) dt.29-06-2026
5. Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Gautam/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U T