Patna High Court
CR. MISC./41926/2026 of Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 29 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41926 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Prince Kumar Son of Rameshwar Rai @ Ramswaroop Ray R/o - Dullapur, Police Station - Goraul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41926 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-557 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ======================================================
Prince Kumar Son of Rameshwar Rai @ Ramswaroop Ray R/o - Dullapur, Police Station - Goraul (Katahara), District - Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(1), 126(2), 109, 304 and 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that one Sumit Kumar Rai has fired with country made pistol at the husband of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the name of this petitioner does not find place in the FIR. He was remanded in this case from Mahua P.S. Case No. 105 of 2026 wherein he has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41926 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
given his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against him. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the main thrust of allegation is against one Sumit Rai. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.03.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having four criminal antecedents.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Goraul (Katahara) P.S. Case No. 557 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of A.C.J.M. I, Vaishali at Hajipur.
Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T