Patna High Court
CR. MISC./41217/2026 of Jaypal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 29 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41217 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Kasar District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1. Jaypal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41217 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- Kasar District- Sheikhpura
======================================================
1.
Jaypal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura
2.
Dharmpal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura
3.
Shishupal Kumar Son of Jairam Raut Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Kasar, District- Sheikhpura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 109, 76, 303(2), 329(4), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioners along with others have assaulted the informant and her family members.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41217 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026
also a counter version of this case. It has further been submitted that nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Both the parties are agnates and in the occurrence, both the parties have received injuries. It has further been submitted that though injury of the injured persons shows that they have received grievous injuries but the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. It was a free fight between the parties. Petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 17.04.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sheikhpura in connection with Kasar P.S. Case No.36 of 2026.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T