Patna High Court
CR. MISC./40968/2026 of Raju Pandey @ Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 25 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40968 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2024 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Raju Pandey @ Raju Kumar S/o- Surendra Pandey R/v- Naya Tola Bariyarpur Ps- Bakhtiyarpur Dist-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40968 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2024 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ======================================================
Raju Pandey @ Raju Kumar S/o- Surendra Pandey R/v- Naya Tola Bariyarpur Ps- Bakhtiyarpur Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 12.06.2024 at 4:15 P.M., the informant saw that co-accused persons, namely, Biru Rai and Pankaj Kumar were abusing the son of the informant near the house of co-accused Gauri Rai and co-accused Niraj Kumar and his brother were holding the hand of the informant’s son. When the informant ran to save his son, co-accused Gauri Rai fired upon the chest of the informant’s son due to which he subsequently died.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40968 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the nature of allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. The specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Gauri Rai. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Niraj Kumar @ Vivek Kumar has already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 87300 of 2024. It has further been submitted that in this case, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.03.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Barh, Patna in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40968 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
connection with Bkhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 339 of 2024.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T