Patna High Court

CR. MISC./40990/2026 of Anurag Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 25 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40990 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2025 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Anurag Kumar S/o Satendra Singh R/o Village - Sandhwa, P.S - Dinara, District - Rohtas at

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40990 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2025 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ======================================================

Anurag Kumar S/o Satendra Singh R/o Village - Sandhwa, P.S - Dinara, District - Rohtas at Sasaram

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mrs. Ojaswee Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 308 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 306(2), 316(5), 318(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the brother of the petitioner namely, Amrit Raj has transferred altogether Rs. 17,640/- in his account.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that Anurag Kumar (the petitioner) has assured that he will return the said amount. He further submits Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40990 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026

that the main thrust of allegation is against the petitioner’s brother namely, Amrit Raj. He further submits that save and except the allegation that the petitioner is the brother of Amrit Raj, there is nothing against him. The petitioner has not misappropriated any sum. Lastly, it has been submitted that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 23.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Ara (Bhojpur) in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 308 of 2025.

Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead