Patna High Court

CR. MISC./40336/2026 of Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 24 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40336 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2026 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== Pappu Yadav Son of Lutan Yadav Resident of Village- Gosain Gaon, P.S.- Ghoswari, District- Patna.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40336 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2026 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ======================================================

Pappu Yadav Son of Lutan Yadav Resident of Village- Gosain Gaon, P.S.- Ghoswari, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Ms. Aishwarya Shankar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with others, has made firing, but none of the fire has hit the informant, rather, the same has hit in the shop of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the nature of allegation is general and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40336 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026

omnibus and the informant has not received any kind of injury. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026.

Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead