Patna High Court
CR. MISC./16985/2026 of Rahul Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar on 24 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16985 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8225 Year-2025 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Rahul Kumar Ranjan S/o Mahadeo Prasad Gupta Resident of Ground Floor, Khata No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16985 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8225 Year-2025 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna
======================================================
1.
Rahul Kumar Ranjan S/o Mahadeo Prasad Gupta Resident of Ground Floor, Khata No. 53/79, Purushottam Bakhri, Kalyanpur, P.S - Chakmehsi, District
- Samastipur, Pin- 848302 Proprietor of M/S - Gupta Home Solution
2.
Mahadeo Prasad Gupta S/o Late Nand Kishor Gupta Resident of Ground Floor, Khata No. 53/79, Purushottam Bakhri, Kalyanpur, P.S - Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848302
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Rohit Kumar Banka S/o Late Anil Kumar Banka Proprietor of M/s Shree Salasarispat Having its Place of Busines at Kanti Factory Road, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, P.S - Patrakar Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna - 800026
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Kaushik Anand, Advocate
Mr. Uday Prakash Sharma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Matloob Rab, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
3 24-06-2026 Mr. Kaushik Anand, learned Advocate, appearing for Mr. Uday Prakash Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
2. Learned Advocate for the State is present.
3. In view of such submission, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
uday/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T