Patna High Court
CR. MISC./40197/2026 of Rajeev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 23 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40197 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rajeev Yadav Son of Late Naresh Yadav R/o vill.- Bahgmara - Barauni - 02, Madhurapur, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40197 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ======================================================
Rajeev Yadav Son of Late Naresh Yadav R/o vill.- Bahgmara - Barauni - 02, Madhurapur, P.S.- Teghra, Dist.- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner one country made carbine, one country made pistol and four live cartridge were recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while making seizure, Section 105 of B.N.S.S. has not been complied and the seizure list witnesses are police personnel. Petitioner is having eleven criminal antecedents.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40197 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 21.11.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 376 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. -IV Begusarai with following conditions :-
1. The petitioner shall cooperate in trial and shall remain physically present in the trial court on each and every fixed date.
2. One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall also mark his weekly attendance at Teghra P.S.
Sneha/- Dolly/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T