Patna High Court
CR. MISC./40266/2026 of Sandeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 23 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40266 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2022 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar S/O Madan Ram R/o Vill -lakshmipur lakhnipur P.S-paharpur dist -East
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40266 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2022 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ======================================================
Sandeep Kumar S/O Madan Ram R/o Vill -lakshmipur lakhnipur P.S-paharpur dist -East champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Priyesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that six miscreants on their motorcycles accosted the informant, threatened him at gunpoint and demanded his belongings. Some scuffle took place between them and a country made pistol, two cartridges and a mobile phone fell down from one of the miscreants while the informant was snatching his jacket in the scuffle. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation for being involved in the said occurrence.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40266 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been roped in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ankit Kumar. Except for this confessional statement, there is no other material to show the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.04.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 42 of 2022.
Sneha/- Dolly/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T