Patna High Court
/39117/2026 of Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 23 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39117 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2026 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/O Shambhu Prasad @ Shambhu Kumar @ Shambhukumar Lachha Mahto R/O Vill.- Karakayan,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39117 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2026 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda ======================================================
Rohit Kumar S/O Shambhu Prasad @ Shambhu Kumar @ Shambhukumar Lachha Mahto R/O Vill.- Karakayan, P.S- Ghoshwari, Distt.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(2), 340(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.,2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had input that the petitioner along with others is indulged in cyber fraud. On this input, the place was raided. It is alleged that from the room of petitioner and one other, as many as 12 mobile phones, certain debit cards and laptops were recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39117 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the police have not recovered any incriminating material. There is no complaint against the petitioner that he has cheated anybody or has committed cyber fraud with any person. He further submits that the police have recorded the statement of the petitioner, in which it has come out that the petitioner is involved in cyber fraud. Save and accept the confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2026. It has further been submitted that similarly situated accused Dheeraj Kumar has already been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 34422 of 2026.
5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39117 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2026.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T