Patna High Court

CWJC/7243/2026 of Dr. Rishi Kapoor Vs The State of Bihar on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7243 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Dr. Rishi Kapoor, Son of Kedar Prasad, Resident of flat No. 403-B, Major Gali, Patel Path, Belly Kunj Apartment, Shekhpura, Patna, P,S,- Phulwarisharif, District-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7243 of 2026

======================================================

1.

Dr. Rishi Kapoor, Son of Kedar Prasad, Resident of flat No. 403-B, Major Gali, Patel Path, Belly Kunj Apartment, Shekhpura, Patna, P,S,- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.

2.

Surabhi Rathore, Wife of Dr. Rishi Kapoor, Resident of flat No. 403-B, Major Gali, Patel Path, Belly Kunj Apartment, Shekhpura, Patna, P,S,- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt of Bihar Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Patna District, Patna.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Patna.

4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna District, Patna.

5.

The S.H.O. Digha Police Station, District Patna.

6.

Anil Kumar, son of Late Tejnarayan Das, resident of Pillar No.293, Digha Nahar Road P.S. and P.O. and District- Patna.

7.

Rohit Kumar, Son of Ravindra Kumar, resident of Piller No. 294, Digha Nahar Road, P.O. and P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

8.

Indrabhushan Srivastava, Son of not known, resident of Piller No. 298, Digha Nahar Road, P.O. and P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

9.

Sandeep Kumar, Son of Not Known, resident of Piller No. 298, Digha Nahar Road, P.O. and P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

... ... Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Virendra Kuar, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Standing Counsel (26)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

23-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned SC-26 for the State.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the common passage which was granted at the time of purchasing the land in question is being obstructed by the private respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7243 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they had approached the authorities raising the grievance that the common passage is being obstructed by the private respondents, however, none of the authorities has taken cognizance of the fact and the said individuals are trying to obstruct the passage by building a boundary wall.

4. The learned AC to SC-26 submits that the petitioners may be directed to approach the authority with a proper application and the same shall be considered and necessary orders be passed taking into account the fact that the said passage is a private road as contended by the petitioners themselves.

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into account the fact that the petitioners had purchased the said land and there was an arrangement for common passage, however, some of the residents of the area are trying to obstruct the common passage which was carved out from the private land, this Court feels that authorities should act in such cases.

6. In view of the aforesaid, the S.H.O. Digha Police Station, Patna is directed to make an inquiry and submit a report as to whether any obstruction or hindrance is being created by any of the private respondents in a common passage and if the Patna High Court CWJC No.7243 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026

S.H.O. Digha Police Station finds any obstruction being created, a report shall be submitted to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Patna, who shall see to it that a proceeding is initiated against the said persons for causing hindrance and proper action be taken against the erring persons.

7. The present writ application stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

sweta/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead