Patna High Court

CR. MISC./39142/2026 of Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39142 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2026 Thana- Chitragupta Nagar District- Patna ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/O Shankar Chauhan R/O Kadamkuan,Ward no- 38, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39142 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2026 Thana- Chitragupta Nagar District- Patna ======================================================

Vijay Kumar S/O Shankar Chauhan R/O Kadamkuan,Ward no- 38, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Arun Bharti, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chitragupta Nagar P.S. Case No. 110 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21, 22(c), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that two persons in an auto were found. They were having a bag and in that bag, there was huge amount of intoxicating medicines. They were being asked, and they stated that they had brought the same from one Mehta, and from the compound of Mehta, the recovery of certain medicines was made.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39142 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026

committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that though it is stated that from the bag huge amount of intoxicating medicines were recovered but the same are not detailed in the FIR, nor is there any seizure list there; recovery, if any, has been made from Mehta Compound. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.04.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (NDPS Act), Patna in connection with Chitragupta Nagar P.S. Case No. 110 of 2026.

Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead