Patna High Court
CR. MISC./39507/2026 of Subham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 22 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39507 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2025 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Subham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Son of Chhote Lal Prasad @ Chottelal R/V- Gola Road Behind D.A.V
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39507 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2025 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ======================================================
Subham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Son of Chhote Lal Prasad @ Chottelal R/V- Gola Road Behind D.A.V School, Ward No-20,P.s- Danapur, Dist-Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the offence punishable under Section 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants have snatched the golden chain and earphone of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of the investigation, the petitioner was remanded in the present case from Rajeev Nagar P.S. Case No. 761 of 2025, wherein he has given his confessional Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39507 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
statement. He also submits that there is no recovery from the possession of this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of 19 cases. Earlier the petitioner had criminal antecedent of only one case, i.e., Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024. Learned counsel submits that after the present case, the petitioner has been framed in all the cases. Save and except the antecedent of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.11.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in trial, shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned court below, one of the bailors should be his near relative and shall also mark his weekly attendance at Rajeev Nagar P.S. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Patna in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39507 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 481 of 2025.
Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T