Patna High Court
CR. MISC./29811/2026 of Prabhat Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 22 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29811 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Prabhat Yadav Son of Akshay Yadav Resident of village- Padminiya Ps- Krishnagarh, Dist-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29811 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ======================================================
Prabhat Yadav Son of Akshay Yadav Resident of village- Padminiya Ps- Krishnagarh, Dist- Bhojpur, Ara
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
22-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 495 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have killed the father of the informant. The informant believes that the petitioner along with others has killed his father, as the son of the informant was having an affair with the daughter of Sriram Yadav.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29811 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the name of this petitioner has been framed in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that from perusal of the FIR, there are altogether six assailants and from perusal of the post- mortem report, it is clear that the deceased has received three gunshot injuries. He further submits that he has been framed in this case due to his criminal antecedents. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 24.10.2025. Learned counsel has further submitted that similarly situated other co-accused persons, namely, Bhola Yadav and Ritesh Yadav have been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 18693 of 2026 and 21964 of 2026 respectively. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29811 of 2026(2) dt.22-06-2026
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 495 of 2025.
lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T