Patna High Court
CWJC/10237/2020 of Soni Kumari Vs The State of Bihar on 22 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10237 of 2020 ====================================================== Soni Kumari W/o Shyam Kishore Bharti, R/o Village- Karma, P.O.- Karhara, P.S. and Block- Jhajha, District - Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10237 of 2020
======================================================
Soni Kumari W/o Shyam Kishore Bharti, R/o Village- Karma, P.O.- Karhara, P.S. and Block- Jhajha, District - Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director I.C.D.S. Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Commissioner, Munger Region, District - Munger.
5.
The District Magistrate, Jamui, District - Jamui.
6.
The District Programme Officer Intigrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS), Jamui, District - Jamui.
7.
The Block Development Officer, Block- Jhajha, District - Jamui.
8.
The Child Development Project Officer, Block- Jhajha, District - Jamui.
9.
The Ward Member-cum-Chairman, Anganbari Selection Committee, Ward No.- 7, Gram Panchayat Raj Karhara Block - Jhajha, District - Jamui.
10.
Subhit Yadav, S/o Late Goverdhan Yadav, R/o Village - Karma, P.O.
Karhara, P.S. and Block- Jhajha, District - Jamui.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP-2
Mr. Lala Rais, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
11 22-06-2026 Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner after some arguments, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. Learned Advocate for the State, Mr. Lala Rais has no objection.
3. In view thereof, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
sumit/siddharth- (Harish Kumar, J) U