Patna High Court

C. REV./96/2023 of Madan Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, on 19 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.96 of 2023 In Letters Patent Appeal No.638 of 2022 ====================================================== Madan Kumar Das Son of Late Mahanth Pancham Das Mahanth of Ati Prachin Udasin Bari Sangat, Resident of Mohalla- Madhubani, P.S.-K. Hat in the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.96 of 2023

In

Letters Patent Appeal No.638 of 2022

======================================================

Madan Kumar Das Son of Late Mahanth Pancham Das Mahanth of Ati Prachin Udasin Bari Sangat, Resident of Mohalla- Madhubani, P.S.-K. Hat in the District of Purnea (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Inspector General of Registration, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Katihar.

4.

The Sub-Registrar, Katihar in the District of Katihar.

5.

Dera Sahi Samadan Patiala, a Dera of Udasin Sect of Baba Sri Chandra Jee through Mahanth Deepinder Das, Chela Mahanth Jagat Ram at New Dal Dalian Patiala, Punjab Being the Superior of Dera of Udasin Sangat, Mohalla- Madhubani, Police Station-K. Hat, District- Purnea.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Raju Giri, Sr. Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (Aag 5)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA)

19-06-2026

1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Raju Giri and the learned AC to AAG-5 for the State.

2. The learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the review application, as it has been submitted that grievance of Patna High Court C. REV. No.96 of 2023(6) dt.19-06-2026

the review petitioner stands redressed.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the instant civil review application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J)

( Harish Kumar, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead