Patna High Court
CR. MISC./37105/2026 of Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 18 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- Gurupa District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Yadav Son of Late Ramchandra Yadav @ Late Chandra Yadav @ Chandu Yadav Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37105 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- Gurupa District- Gaya ======================================================
Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Yadav Son of Late Ramchandra Yadav @ Late Chandra Yadav @ Chandu Yadav Resident of village - Samarchak, P.S.- Gurpa, District - Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s
:
Ms. Asha Devi, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Gurpa P.S. Case No.11 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that altogether 200 litres of country made liquor and a keypad mobile was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this case because the keypad mobile belongs to him. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37105 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 18.04.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases of similar nature.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of offence in future. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Exclussive Special Excise Court No.-4, Gaya Ji in connection with Gurpa P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025.
durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T