Patna High Court
CR. MISC./37831/2026 of Komli Devi @ Kamala Devi @ Kamali Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 17 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37831 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Komli Devi @ Kamala Devi @ Kamali Devi wife of Late Chandeshwar Paswan R/V - Laksena, P.S -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37831 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ======================================================
Komli Devi @ Kamala Devi @ Kamali Devi wife of Late Chandeshwar Paswan R/V - Laksena, P.S - Phulparas, District - Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 80(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one Bindu Kumari (deceased) was married to Rohit Kumar Paswan. It is alleged that she was subjected to cruelty on account of non- fulfillment of dowry demand of Rupees Two lakhs. It is further alleged that on 19.02.2026, the informant came to know that his daughter has been killed by the in-laws.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37831 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus and the main thrust of allegation is against the husband who is already in custody. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since 20.02.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026.
Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T