Patna High Court
CR. MISC./37854/2026 of Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 17 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37854 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Son of Shree Bhagwan Ray Resident of village- Bagha, Baiju Barhoga, P.S. Basantpur,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37854 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ======================================================
Rohit Kumar Son of Shree Bhagwan Ray Resident of village- Bagha, Baiju Barhoga, P.S. Basantpur, Distt. - Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 363 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(2), 341(1), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that when the petitioner was going to appear in the examination conducted by the BPSC, at the gate itself, he was found having concealed Bluetooth in his slippers, and thereafter, he was not allowed to appear in the examination.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37854 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
case. He also submits that the petitioner was apprehended at the entry gate and he could not appear in the examination, as such, the question of cheating in examination does not arise. It is merely a case of an aborted attempt. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 21.04.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 363 of 2026.
Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T