Patna High Court
CR. MISC./27068/2026 of Ratan Das Vs The State of Bihar on 17 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27068 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2025 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Ratan Das, Son of Nagendra Das, Resident of Village- Bhatpokhra, P.S.- Jale, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27068 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2025 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ======================================================
1.
Ratan Das, Son of Nagendra Das, Resident of Village- Bhatpokhra, P.S.- Jale, District- Darbhanga
2.
Nagina Das, Son of Late Tetar Das, Resident of Village- Bhatpokhra, P.S.- Jale, District- Darbhanga
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
17-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jale P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025, registered for the offence(s) under Section(s) 191(2), 190(2), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.).
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioners is that they had assaulted the informant and others and caused grievous injuries to them.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case because Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27068 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
they are relatives of co-accused Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Das. It has further been submitted that though there is allegation of assault however, the injuries caused to the injured persons are found to be simple in nature while one of the injuries caused to injured Jay Kishore Das was found to be grievous in nature. It has next been submitted that the parties have entered into compromise and the compromise petition has been filed before the learned Court below. It has lastly been submitted that both the petitioners have two criminal antecedents each in which they are on bail.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, above-named, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court/successor Court within a period of four weeks from today, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court/successor Court where the case is pending in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27068 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026
with Jale P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with corresponding Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) as well as subject to the following conditions :
(i) The bail bonds of the petitioners shall be accepted by the learned concerned Court/successor Court only after verifying the factum of compromise entered into and filed on behalf of the parties.
(ii) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be their close relative and the other shall be a local resident.
(iii) The petitioners shall remain physically present before the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial and shall cooperate in the investigation.
(iv) In case of absence for two consecutive occasions or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the concerned Court.
7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.
8. The application stands allowed.
deepak/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U T