Patna High Court
L.P.A/124/2025 of Ranvijay Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar on 15 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.124 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16402 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Ranvijay Tiwari S/o Baliram Tiwari, R/o Village- Dharhara, Durgawati, P.S. Durgawati, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.124 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16402 of 2023
======================================================
1.
Ranvijay Tiwari S/o Baliram Tiwari, R/o Village- Dharhara, Durgawati, P.S.
Durgawati, District - Kaimur at Bhabua.
2.
Jitendra Kumar alias Jitendra Kumar Giri S/o Late Ramesh Giri, R/o Mohalla - Ward No. 10, Chhawni, P.S. Bhabua, District- Kaimur.
... ... Appellants
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The State Health Society, through its Executive Director, Sheikhpura, Patna.
3.
The Secretary, State Health Society, Sheikhpura, Patna.
4.
The District Magistrate cum President, District Health Society, District - Kaimur at Bhabua, Bihar.
5.
The Civil Surgeon cum Member Secretary, District Health Society, District - Kaimur at Bhabua, Bihar.
6.
The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Kaimur at Bhabua, Bihar.
7.
The In Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Durgawati, District - Kaimur.
8.
The In Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Nywan, District- Kaimur.
... ... Respondents
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Ravish Mishra, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Additional Advocate General (9)
For the Resp. Nos.3 & 4 :
Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
15-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The impugned order dated 20.04.2024 passed in Patna High Court L.P.A No.124 of 2025(3) dt.15-06-2026
C.W.J.C. No. 16402 of 2023 reads as follows: “The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- “1. That the present writ application is being filed for issuance of Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, direction, quashing the Letter No. 127 dated 27.01.2022 (Annexure 3), issued by the Respondent No.5, whereby the Petitioners have been directed to get registered themselves with Urmila International Services Private Limited, failing which the Petitioners shall be restrain from discharging their duties. The Petitioners further prays for consequential writ of Mandamus, commanding the Respondent authorities, especially the Respondent No. 4 and 5 to forthwith allow the Petitioners to work as Date Entry Operators, in view of the fact that now it is not necessary for the Data Entry Operators, working with the Health Society to get themselves registered with the aforesaid Private Company for disbursement of salary, rather the Health Department is directly sending funds to the respective Health Societies for making payment of salaries to the operator and also pay full remuneration to the Petitioners from September 2021 to January 2022 i.e. the period during which the Petitioners discharged their duties, however they were not paid their remuneration. The Petitioners in Patna High Court L.P.A No.124 of 2025(3) dt.15-06-2026
alternative prays for a direction upon the Respondent No.4 to decide the detail Representation of the Petitioners dated 03.08.2023 sent through speed post.”
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent- authorities for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.”
3. In such circumstances, we are of the considered view that the Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable and stands disposed off accordingly.
4. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.
shailendra/- (Meenakshi Madan Rai, CJ) (Soni Shrivastava, J) U