Patna High Court
CR. MISC./37104/2026 of Shivam Kumar @ Kallu Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 15 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37104 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2026 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Shivam Kumar @ Kallu Singh S/o Mathura Prasad Singh @ Mukul Singh Resident Of Village-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37104 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2026 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
Shivam Kumar @ Kallu Singh S/o Mathura Prasad Singh @ Mukul Singh Resident Of Village- Athri, Ps- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
15-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 308(3), 111(1), 111(2) and 111(4) of BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has threatened the informant of dire consequences.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that save and except the allegation of threatening, there is nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that learned trial court has rejected the bail application of the petitioner only on the basis of his criminal antecedent. He is having criminal Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37104 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026
antecedent of ten cases. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 26.03.2026.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 118 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi with following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall cooperate in trial and shall remain physically present in the trial court on each and every fixed date.
(ii) Petitioner is also directed to mark his weekly attendance at Runnisaidpur P.S.
Shubham/- Sneha/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T