Patna High Court
CR. MISC./36204/2026 of Putul Kumari Vs The State of Bihar on 10 June 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36204 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2026 Thana- JAMALPUR RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Putul Kumari W/O Putul Pasi R/O village- Dasrathpur P.S.- Dharhara Distrct-Munger
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36204 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2026 Thana- JAMALPUR RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
1.
Putul Kumari W/O Putul Pasi R/O village- Dasrathpur P.S.- Dharhara Distrct-Munger
2.
Kedali Devi W/O Pannu Pasi @ Mannu Passi R/O Village- Mihazam Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Mihizam District-Zamtara Jharkhand.
3.
Sobha Devi W/O Bindeshri Pasi R/O Village- Mihazam Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Mihizam District-Zamtara Jharkhand.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
10-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, has pointed out that due to inadvertence petitioner no.1 Putul Kumari has been stated to be the daughter of Putul Pasi whereas she is the wife of Putul Pasi and the said correction has been made by way of supplementary affidavit.
3. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioners in connection with Jamalpur GRP P.S. Case no.17 of 2026 registered under sections 303(2), 305(c), 317(4), 112(2), 336(3) and 341(1) of BNS, 2023.
4. Allegation in the F.I.R is that some unknown miscreant snatched mangalsutra of the informant and ran away.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a case of theft of mangalsutra was reported against some unknown Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36204 of 2026(2) dt.10-06-2026
miscreant for which Jamalpur P.S. Case No.15 of 2026 was registered, however, the petitioners were not made accused in the said case. However, during investigation in Jamalpur GRP Case No.17 of 2026, two women were seen in CCTV footage under some suspicious state and when raid was conducted some gold jewelry, silver etc. were recovered from the house of four women, however T.I.P was not held. As such, there is no clear link of the said articles being stolen one. The petitioners are ladies having no criminal antecedent and are in custody since 14.04.2026.
6. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
7. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the articles recovered have not been put on T.I.P. and petitioners have no criminal antecedent, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Jamalpur GRP P.S. Case no.17 of 2026 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court.
Harsh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T